Blog

Jacob Prasch Barks to Questioner, “Sir, You HAVE To LEAVE The Building!”

This is the FOURTH and final update to the segment from the film ‘Jacob Prasch is Witchfinder General’ ( vimeo.com/313843746 ) which initially listed the 9 people Jacob Prasch has demanded debate him (debates of course which never happened).

After it was released more ’bouts’ were uncovered, swelling the size of the now standalone clip:

First Edition (20 Bouts): vimeo.com/314721434

Second Edition (28 Bouts): vimeo.com/353742027

Third Edition (42 Bouts): vimeo.com/364255468

Fourth Edition (56 Bouts): [the video below]

In this edition, after Prasch lists all the people he secretly doesn’t want to debate but says he wants to for the sake of the steady flow of narcissistic supply the demands give him, Prasch lists 2 people from the Toronto Vineyard nonsense, but immediately finds himself being heckled by a member of the audience causing Prasch -in the midst of calling for public debates- to demand that this opponent depart the building, whilst plying him with the perfectly stupid claim that after his talk people are welcome to debate. It’s a bit hard to debate someone when you just had them thrown out the building! But that is the Prasch strategy in action, to call for debate, then do everything possible to undermine the chances of being questioned.
If you think about it, if Prasch had actually debated some of these 56 people, he’d have realised he isn’t right about everything (or right about much, even), and may have been humbled, but since he has avoided it, he has steadily bricked himself inside his ivory tower (or echo chamber), only allowing in the people who agree with him, thus resulting in him becoming the leader of his own personality cult.

The ’bout’ list now is:
Anton Bosch
John MacArthur
Rick Warren
Nicky Gumbel
Gary Burge
Chuck Colson
R.T. Kendall
Stewart Menelaws
Stephen Sizer
Phil Johnson
Francis Chan
Anthony Hilder
Paul Manwaring
Dr. Michael Brown
Phillip Church
Hank Hannergraaff
Chris Rosebrough
JD Hall
Todd Friel
Paul Wilkinson
Rabbi Abraham Finkelstein
Rabbi Shmuel Arkush
Robert Sungenis
Scott Hahn
JD Farag
Dr. Thomas Ice
John Piper
David Nathan
Jan Markell
Ahmed Deedat
Rabbi Shmuel “Shmuley” Boteach
Daniel Juster
Craig Kacev
Karl Keating
Bill Johnson
Steven Furtick
Gayle Erwin
Ian Bilby
Wayne Hughes
Phil Pringle
Leif Munk
Stephen Tollestrup
Greg Laurie
Gustav Scheller
Rick Joyner
Gary Demar
Bill Subritzky
Wynne Lewis
Warwick Shenton
Andrew Evans
David Cartledge
Phil Hills
Kevin Conner
John Arnott
Rodney Howard-Browne
Carl Lentz

I can’t fit any more names on the screen so I figure this is the natural end to this bit of research, but if you do stumble upon any other person Prasch has demanded to debate him, then please post a link to the YouTube video in the comments section below.

Jacob Prasch: Fake Debater Extraordinaire

In a previous blog post I talked about fake Jew Jacob Prasch’s rationale for demanding debates from dozens of religious leaders, then deliberately not pursuing them (or undermining them so they don’t happen). That post was written when the number of debate demands to Protestant, Catholic, Jewish, and Muslim leaders/teachers stood at a massive 28. After recently doing a spot more research I’ve uncovered a further FOURTEEN demanded debates, meaning now a full 42 people have received their social media summons to the court of Prasch.

The 42 are:
Anton Bosch
John MacArthur
Rick Warren
Nicky Gumbel
Gary Burge
Chuck Colson
R.T. Kendall
Stewart Menelaws
Stephen Sizer
Phil Johnson
Francis Chan
Anthony Hilder
Paul Manwaring
Dr. Michael Brown
Phillip Church
Hank Hannergraaff
Chris Rosebrough
JD Hall
Todd Friel
Paul Wilkinson
Rabbi Abraham Finkelstein
Rabbi Shmuel Arkush
Robert Sungenis
Scott Hahn
JD Farag
Dr. Thomas Ice
John Piper
David Nathan
Jan Markell
Ahmed Deedat
Rabbi Shmuel “Shmuley” Boteach
Daniel Juster
Craig Kacev
Karl Keating
Bill Johnson
Steven Furtick
Gayle Erwin
Ian Bilby
Wayne Hughes
Phil Pringle
Leif Munk
Stephen Tollestrup

Here are the 42 demands:

In this 3rd edition Prasch breaks out Goliath’s sword and threatens decapitation of a rival(!!). It is actually an ideal view of the failure of Prasch’s Midrash teaching (which contrasts OT and NT and tries to draw parallels and consequently draws them out into present day), with Prasch’s fool conclusion to David & Goliath being that when you debate someone you are comparatively the shepherd David attacking Goliath, the Bible is comparatively David’s stones in his slingshot, Goliath is comparatively your debate opponent, and Goliath’s sword is comparatively a false belief system, and therefore since David cut off the head of his opponent with his own sword, Prasch thinks he’s to take the false belief system of his opponent and execute them with it! This is total nonsense and you could insert any situation into any in the Bible as a means of justifying a godless bent to attack people as Prasch commonly does. By teaching Midrash whilst being an angry person, Prasch has reduced it into his system of destroying others. He is a dangerous lunatic in my honest opinion.

The original video wherein Prasch stuck his head in the Midrash vice and tightened it until he believed he was King David, can be seen in all its ‘glory’ here:

If you know of any more demanded debates from Prasch please post a YouTube link in the comments.

Jacob Prasch Unplugged…and Unhinged

A while ago JD Hall of Pulpit & Pen did a podcast that touched on Phil Johnson’s ‘Jacob Prasch Unplugged’ video from Youtube where Phil took Prasch’s screaming rant from Bill Randles’ Believers in Grace church in Iowa about John MacArthur’s Strange Fire Conference, and fact-checked it along the way. Prasch’s presentation was so overloaded with lies, historical revisionism, idiocy and screaming, that when he was quite embarrassingly debunked by Phil Johnson, Prasch obviously asked the (formerly?) malleable Bill Randles to vanish the original video from the internet.

The below video is the podcast audio of JD Hall’s review, with the videos he was watching added in. Of particular interest is JD Hall betting with his listeners that Jacob Prasch is missing part of his brain. This question I also asked a few months ago in ‘Important Grey Matter is Missing: Prasch Paints White, black’ where I looked at a similarly OTT (and probably drunk) performance by Prasch earlier this year making similarly outrageously stupid claims, this time about Dr James White, which about 2 minutes of research debunked. But Prasch’s typical audience don’t research Prasch’s claims, because, as the whole 2 season Prasch series demonstrates, Prasch attracts followers who have adopted Prasch as their thinker as a means of avoiding having to think for themselves.

Jacob Prasch Unplugged…and Unhinged

Important Grey Matter is Missing: Prasch Paints White, black

Everybody has two systems at work in their brain, commonly called Fast Thinking vs. Slow Thinking, (or Intuition vs Reasoning, and Automatic Thinking vs Controlled Thinking). The first system, the Fast Thinking/Intuition/Automatic system of the brain (stemming from the limbic system area) controls human emotions (anger and fear, etc), and memory, specifically memories associated with protection, and consequently is associated with directing people away from pain but toward things that feel good.
The second system, the Slow Thinking/Reasoning/Controlled Thinking (at work in the neocortex) controls deeper thinking such as planning, figuring out complexities, and simulating outcomes. A healthy brain has the two systems working together in unison, with the first Fast Thinking part at work in controlling movements like walking, driving, etc., and the second Slow Thinking part concentrating on reason and planning. It is very obvious when the brain is impaired and one system is dominant, for a person’s Fast Thinking responses characterise them, such as emoting instead of thinking, summed up in these proverbs:

“A fool’s anger is known at once, But a prudent man conceals dishonor.”
(Proverbs 12:16 NASB)

“A wise man is cautious and turns away from evil, But a fool is arrogant and careless. A quick-tempered man acts foolishly, And a man of evil devices is hated.”
(Proverbs 14:16-17)

“The tongue of the wise makes knowledge acceptable, But the mouth of fools spouts folly.”
(Proverbs 15:2)

“A fool does not delight in understanding, But only in revealing his own mind.”
(Proverbs 18:2)

A person dominated by Fast Thinking is naturally dominated by emotive response to stimuli and seeking good feelings, whereas a person whose Fast Thinking immediate responses are overrode by the power of their Slow/Controlled Thinking which has command over their emotions, finds that they can stay calm in the face of anything including temptation.

Jacob Prasch is a person utterly dominated and driven by quite base and idiot emotions, and has no control it seems over his mouth, and is consequently labeled by the Bible throughout Proverbs as the fool. In fact, even before allegedly becoming a Christian, Prasch admits he was a hardcore cocaine junkie, a lifestyle choice utterly dominated by Fast Thinking which wants immediate good feelings. He hasn’t changed at all in the decades since, with his new ‘drug’ being a flow of narcissistic supply that is triggered by his ranting in front of an audience (an audience who coincidentally seem to assume his rapid-fire Fast Thinking equates to intelligence when it can conversely be a sign of a lack of intelligence and lying).
Consider Jacob Prasch’s endless ranting, screaming, hyperbolic tantrums from all the videos I’ve documented in the series, in light of what Proverbs says about the fool:

Fools despise wisdom and instruction. (1:7)

Doing wickedness is like sport to a fool. (10:23)

The way of a fool is right in his own eyes. (12:15)

The heart of a fool proclaims folly. (12:23)

The companion of fools will suffer harm. (13:20)

In the mouth of the foolish is a rod for his back. (14:3)

A rebuke goes deeper into one who has understanding than a hundred blows into a fool. (17:10)

Let a man meet a bear robbed of her cubs, rather than a fool in his folly. (17:12)

Like a dog that returns to its vomit is a fool who repeats his folly. (26:11)

Prasch knows of all the evidence revealed proving his ramped-up godlessness of recent years, and his lies over decades, yet he doesn’t act like someone whose brain’s Slow Thinking second system ever manages to suppress his Fast Thinking response to it all in order to change his way in accordance to someone who has wisdom and can accept a rebuke. Indeed, when you consider all the dissonance Prasch has been battered with over the past year, you only find this proverb to be most true:

“Though you pound a fool in a mortar with a pestle along with crushed grain, yet his foolishness will not depart from him.”
(Proverbs 27:22)

If you are still a follower/disciple/cult member of Prasch who is biblically a fool, an idiot, an imbecile whose foolishness will not depart him no matter how much is revealed about him, I suggest you turn quickly from your adopted thinker/protector, and wise up, lest you remain like him:

“Leave the presence of a fool, Or you will not discern words of knowledge.” (14:7)

Prasch Targets Bill Randles and Peter Danzy

As Jacob Prasch tries to eliminate Bible teacher and pastor Bill Randles by linking him to heretics, as covered in the previous blog post, I thought I’d do some digging and answer the question about who the alleged heretic is.

Now bear in mind Prasch has declared half a dozen people heretics this past year using the most fake and ridiculous twisted information (as documented in the 24-part video series), so nothing Prasch actually says can be trusted in any way, but it appears Prasch sent this email about 4 months ago (a month prior to his first lynching of Bill Randles), that tried to link Randles to someone Prasch deemed a heretic…

___________start__________

Bill Randles goes astray from his faith.

Christian Greetings

I am replying to your question and request. It is not confidential. You may circulate it as you believe you are led of The Lord to do so. I do not care as I would not say such things privately that I would not say to someone’s face.

You ask what heresies specifically.

I told you Patri-Passionism & Pneuma-Passionism (his own unique version of the 2 ancient heresies).

Peter Danzy who Bill placed in his pulpit at his church in Iowa teaches that Jesus did not complete the work of salvation but only His role in it. He mis-identifies the 2 Witnesses in Revelation Chapt. 11 as God the Father & The Holy Spirit coming in incarnated human form like Jesus and needing to die in Jerusalem and like Jesus raise from the dead with Jesus as their Lord (‘where their Lord was also crucified’). Then and only then will the work of our salvation be complete. Peter Danzy teaches that when Jesus said ‘It Is Finished’ the Greek word ‘telostai’ meaning ‘paid in full’) the price for our sin was not paid in full; Jesus only paid His share of the bill. God The Father and The Holy Spirit also need to come in human flesh and pay for our sin.

As with the word-faith money preachers in the tradition of Branham, Copeland, Hagen, Joyce Meyer etc., Peter Danzy rejects the finished work of the cross and the Blood. But Peter Danzy goes even further. Even the Branhamites say that resurrection of Christ completed the process of salvation (after He was tormented 3 days & nights by Satan in hell – according to their apostasy). Peter Danzy ventures beyond this denying even the sufficiency of the resurrection as well as Calvary. Peter Danzy teaches that God The Fsather and The Holy Spirit must be resurrected from the dead for us to be ultimately saved,.

Patri-passionism and Pneuma-Passionism are ancient heretical beliefs that God The Father and Holy Spirit also died in Christ on the cross at Calvary. In Peter Danzy’s version however, they did not die at Calvary but will die as men in the future. This is what The New Testament defines as “Another Gospel” , fundamentally denying the completed work of Jesus in His death & resurrection to give us salvation. The Epistle to The Galatians says that Peter Danzy is therefore ‘anathema’, that is that he is accursed of God for preaching a different Gospel yet Bill Randles is in bed with him inviting him to preach at Believers In Grace and he is likely helping to organize Bill’s itinerary in Australia (as far as we are still aware).

He has taught this in at least two churches in the USA in California and probably in Australia. When I last saw him in Sydney he affirmed to me that he still believes it. He also got Geoff O’Toole (an Australian missionary in Japan) into believing it. He was with Moriel, but we immediately got rid of him. It is unclear to us if Geoff O’Toole still also believes it or not. Peter Danzy had been on the Moriel Council in Australia for some years, but once we discovered the heresy he was teaching we immediately got rid of him as a heretic. Bill Randles however, invited him to his pulpit – much the same as Bill Randles publicly defended the promoters of David Nathan despite Bill knowing and publicly admitting that David Nathan is a heretic who does not believe the scriptural Gospel.

Although Bill Randles later withdrew his two blog statements defending David Nathan’s supporters and promoters as “his friends”, this is the second time in well under a yea that Bill Randles publicly chose to compromise with those who deny the true Gospel and/or those who promote a false Gospel. Something has very plainly gone wrong with Bill Randles and it lends credence to those who left his church on very ugly terms who now say that Bill Randles is a false shepherd who is deluded by self deception and by the devil.

Defending the promoters of what you know is a heretical denial of the eternal efficaciousness of the Blood of Jesus and giving platform to one who has preached and believes a false gospel is not a shepherd protecting The Lord’s sheep, but rather one who feeds The Lord’s sheep to wolves.

It is worse than this however. Peter Danzy has a false Christology. By teaching the 2 Witnesses of Rev. ch. 11 are God The Father & The Holy Spirit in human form whose Lord is Jesus The Son, Peter Danzy has an utterly false pneumatology (doctrine of The Holy Spirit), an utterly false Theology (doctrine of God), and an utterly false Christology (doctrine of Christ).The real Christ of scripture is not His Father’s Lord. As with the Mormon Christ – the spirit of brother of Satan and not the ‘mongenes’ Only Begotten of The Father), Jehovah’s Witnesses angelic Christ, the eucharistic Christ of Roman Catholicism who returns in the Mass straight out of the baker’s oven and from a jug of wine, or the false Christs of Christian Science, Islam, Christadelphianism and various cults – Peter Danzy has and has preached a different Christ. This got him a preaching invitation from Bill Randles. Both Peter Danzy and David Nathan have false Christologies; but Bill Randles publicly compromised directly concerning one and indirectly regarding the other. This is a false shepherd.

Galatians warns us firmly of those who preach another Christ, yet by his actions Bill Randles could not care less. First it was defending the promoters if David Nathan, now opening his church and pulpit to Peter Danzy with his deviant gospel and false Christ.Lordship over His Father is not merely a false attribute of Christ – but a different Christ altogether. Bill knows this but it made no difference to him by virtue if his public actions.

Bill has tragically gone off big time and needs to get out the ministry. A pastor must protect The Lord’s sheep from deceivers, not have them in his pulpit. A Christian author who represents himself as an apologist for truth and an opponent of egregious error cannot give such deceivers a platform and expose the flock to them. Again, none of this mattered to Bill Randles. It is little wonder his church split and that we have stockpiles of his books that no one wants to buy and read anymore. The Lord’s Hand is no longer on Bill Randles. He has aligned himself with those teaching things from the devil to deceive the elect in the Last Days that Bill once fought against with nobility.

Peter Danzy’s former pastor & mentor – Alan Hodge (whom Bill knows) tried without success to convince Peter Danzy against these terrible lies he preached. Alan is a good brother and a solid pastor, but he got no place with Peter Danzy (I am unsure about Geoff).

But it gets even worse still. I read Peter Danzy’s 8 page defense of his heresy and by theological definition Peter Danzy is a Gnostic. He arrives at these grossly heretical errors by means of a false hermeneutic based on a subjective revelation that comes from mysticism. Instead of contextual and co-textual exegesis and using typology and literary symbolism to illuminate and illustrate doctrine, his claimed revelatory interpretations conclude his dogma from the symbolism.

Once again, this is pure Gnosticism and mysticism and after the time of the Apostles in the Patristic era these things very nearly destroyed the Body of Christ. While not an academic, Bill is an author and not in the doctrinal sense unscholarly , nor is he totally ignorant of early Church history.

When you defend those who support a false Gospel and false Christology one time – maybe it is a mistake, how be it a rather serious one. When you do it twice, even inviting a Gnostic preacher of a another Gospel and, in de facto terms, another Christ, it is no longer a bad and sad mistake. It rather becomes a shame and a disgrace.

These are the proven facts and I can document every syllable.

Once more, I am miserably drawn to King David’s tragic Lament: “How The Mighty Have Fallen’ !

Let it be a warning to the rest of us, and not least of all to my own self.

In Jesus,

Jacob Prasch

(Moriel)

______________end______________

As far as I’m aware, Prasch has only talked about Peter Danzy on video one time, in the process also publicly damning former Moriel Japan missionary from Australia, Geoff O’Toole, and this was back in 2015’s Moriel Conference held at John Flubber Haller’s joint in Ohio:

It is important to note that it was at that same 2015 Moriel conference that Anton Bosch found Prasch had invented quotes of Charles Spurgeon (which led to Prasch attacking him, as documented in ‘Jacob Prasch is Witchfinder General’ vimeo.com/313843746). In this case I’ve not researched the claims about Danzy and O’Toole, but I kept the video rolling to Prasch’s damning of John MacArthur because that I have researched, and was the basis for the part 3 video in December 2018, where I brought it up since Prasch tried to damn me to hell for posting a link to a defence of John MacArthur’s statements about the mark of the beast, aware then that Prasch would use any phoney argumentation to damn anybody his twisted mind wished to damn:

Jacob Prasch The Arch-Damner Strikes Again

 

UPDATE 25 September 2019

Bill Randles responded to Prasch’s idiot and phoney claims on Facebook. A very good response wherein Randles takes the Muppet liar Prasch to task for exaggerating claims about Peter Danzy.

UPDATE 9th October 2019

Bill Randles released a second video response to Prasch’s tall tales:

Jacob Prasch: Lynching Bill Randles (TWICE!)

So today, 22nd September 2019, Jacob Prasch of Moriel Ministries has just stated they (Moriel) won’t be supporting Bible teacher Bill Randles any longer due to the following reasons:

Important Announcement re: Bill Randles and Moriel. Sep 22, 2019

The board of Moriel Ministries finds that Moriel Ministries can no longer be supportive of the ministry of Bill Randles due to doctrinal differences.

The continued support and promotion by Bill Randles of various false teachers of serious false doctrines that Moriel finds heretical are of great concern to the Moriel board.”

(Source: http://moriel.org/latest/latest-news/important-announcement-re-bill-randles-and-moriel-sep-22-2019.html)

Jacob Prasch has over the past year stated the same type of accusation against various people, such as David Nathan (using faked information against David), and Stewart and Deborah Menelaws (for providing David Nathan a platform to defend himself), and Anton Bosch (for proving Prasch made spelling mistakes in his books), and Amir Tsarfati (for stating Charles Spurgeon and Matthew Henry believed the Archangel Michael is Jesus -which they did believe).
In each case Prasch lied to his entrenched followers (‘disciples’ even) to turn people against godly people, sparking ‘witch-hunts’.

In summer 2019 Prasch upped the ante and turned on his former friend Bill Randles and publicly coerced him into committing suicide, the way a cult leader would coerce followers.
However, Randles stood up to Prasch and publicly questioned why people defer to Prasch and don’t question him. Good question!

A few weeks later (today) Prasch has tried to off Randles again, this time with the above message plastered all over his Moriel TV Facebook feed. And as always, Prasch’s followers immediately believed Prasch, despite Prasch providing ZERO evidence to back up his claims against Randles. Prasch is a dangerous nut.

To get up to speed with Prasch’s witch-hunts against Bill Randles, watch these 2 videos from the 24-part series on Prasch’s godless behaviour, from summer and last week:

Muri ga toreba dori hikkomu!

Season 2:6 (Episode 18) Prasch: Lynching Bill Randles

Season 2:12 (Episode 24) Jacob Prasch: The End.

A Warning to the Church about Jacob Prasch

Over the past 10 months Jacob Prasch has been found to be a fake Jew, is being investigated for spiritual abuse and bullying of Christians, has been caught in innumerable lies, and has been exposed endlessly as a godless railer who attacks sound Christian ministries with fake information, utilising phoney argumentation, with the desire to humiliate and destroy the children of God. Nonetheless Prasch refuses to acknowledge blame, refuses to repent, refuses to stand down, and forces himself into various churches around the world as a means of maintaining his platform to attack people.
On 16th August 2019 he is embarking on a Fall tour with 40 dates in churches, hotels and town halls around the world, from New Zealand to Great Britain. If Prasch is coming to your church this Fall then this video is a warning about the person your minister has chosen to allow to roam among the sheep under his protection.

All information alluded to in this short video is covered in-depth in the 11+ hours of videos listed below. See Season 2:7 for a list of major sins from Prasch and the corresponding video in which to view the evidence in.
The most in-depth look at Prasch’s charade about being a Jew is here: bewareofthewolves.blogspot.com/2019/04/is-jacob-prasch-fake-jew.html

Prasch claiming his name comes from ‘Pharisee’ can be seen here:

And here are some more peculiar statements from Prasch that only make sense if he’s saying he’s half Jewish, which we know he isn’t.

Jacob Prasch’s Façade of Being An Untouchable Debator

Jacob Prasch the unrepentant godless railer and slanderer of the children of God, has over his years of screaming in YouTube videos, demanded leading figures in the Christian, Catholic, and Jewish communities debate him publicly “any time any place, so long as there’s a camera”. The list of his demands was first compiled in my January 2019 video ‘Jacob Prasch is Witchfinder General’ (vimeo.com/313843746) which looked at one of Prasch’s attack videos from the same month, which saw him unjustly slander South African Bible teacher Anton Bosch and call him a heretic (for the crime of pointing out Prasch’s spelling mistakes in his books, and lack of citations, and making up quotations of Charles Spurgeon, all of which Bosch proved to be the case). Prasch damned Bosch to Hell as a heretic, then said he’d debate him. While critiquing Prasch’s demand, I remembered several times he’d demanded debates in the past, and I compiled 9 instances of demanded debates for the video.

Upon its release a Vimeoer called 7seals found some more demanded debates, so the segment was plucked out of the feature-length video, and made as a standalone mini feature with now 20 demanded debates. But then over the next few months even more demands were uncovered, bringing the total to a rather colossal TWENTY-EIGHT. So twenty-eight times (at least!) Prasch has called out leading figures to debate him, and zero times debates have actually occured.

The list of 28 figures is:
Anton Bosch
John MacArthur
Rick Warren
Nicky Gumbel
Gary Burge
Chuck Colson
R.T. Kendall
Stewart Menelaws
Stephen Sizer
Phil Johnson
Francis Chan
Anthony Hilder
Paul Manwaring
Dr. Michael Brown
Phillip Church
Hank Hannergraaff
Chris Rosebrough
JD Hall
Todd Friel
Paul Wilkinson
Rabbi Abraham Finkelstein
Rabbi Shmuel Arkush
Robert Sungenis
Scott Hahn
JD Farag
Dr. Thomas Ice
John Piper
David Nathan

With Prasch none of these debates happened for 2 reasons I can postulate:

1) Prasch didn’t want them to happen because if they did he’d be exposed immediately in the debate as an ignorant blowhard who makes things up (such as Spurgeon quotes) and can’t stay on topic, or actually use reason, logic, or sound argumentation (as Dr James White found when having a back-and-forth with Prasch, resulting in a video where White eviscerated Prasch’s mode of thinking so comprehensively (https://vimeo.com/297365453), that Prasch and his cult members have worked hard to discredit White, one particularly memorable moment being Prasch looking totally drunk in Ohio slurring and railing about White with the exact same phoney argumentation that White had dismantled (https://vimeo.com/343526734)).

2) Prasch didn’t want them to happen because the facade would be gone and it is much MUCH easier maintaining the facade that he is some untouchable debater who everybody runs away from than it is putting in the effort of actually debating people and facing the threat of being put to the sword as White did to him, only publicly instead of via webcam. Consequently by demanding debates from dozens of big names, deliberately not pursuing them, then using his opponents’ lack of motivation in debating him, would immediately uncork the bottles of narcissistic supply Prasch pants for, as his ignorant cult members gasp at the way all the big names have “run away” from the mental Colossus who walks in their midst whom they have adopted as their thinker and protector.

Evidence of this being true is Prasch’s demand for a debate with Stephen Sizer over a decade ago over the topic of the Jews (this was over a decade before Prasch was outed as a fake Jew). Prasch must have been terrified at Sizer okaying the live debate on Revelation TV, so worked quickly to undermine it.
Sizer wrote of the build-up to the debate the following…

“Through an intermediary I merely requested a postponement of the debate. Without knowing my reasons, rather prematurely you wrote, “I have nothing to say to such an utterly contemptible servant of hell, and I am not interested in hearing anything from him. He is of his father the devil.” “

So to pull the plug and maintain his untouchable facade, Prasch undermined the chances of the debate happening by “prematurely” riding a wave of ad hominem attack (the argumentational frailty Prasch exhibits day in day out) labelling Sizer basically a Satanist.

Sizer’s views of the failure to debate can be read on his website

stephensizer.com/2008/11/an-open-letter-to-jacob-prasch/

This video looks at all the known 28 times Prasch has demanded debates which have ended in No Contests, with Prasch nonetheless still boasting about how all these people “ran away” from him.

If you know of any other debate demands not directed to the 28 people already listed, please post a comment below, or in the comments section of the video on Vimeo.