Is Jacob Prasch a Psychopath? (Hare Checklist Study)

As it’s Christmas and I’ve traditionally posted some exposé on Jacob Prasch and his cult on Christmas (Christmas Day 2018 saw the release of The Good, The Bad, and the Echo Chamber that first introduced Amos Farrell to the video series, and Christmas 2019 saw the release of Dracula Prasch and His Jewish Blood/Alcohol Levels), I thought I’d present this Christmas a kind of culmination study on Prasch’s behaviour, specifically his suspected psychopathy, and the behavioural gauge I’ll use will be the respected tool of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist.

Hare Psychopathy Checklist

The checklist has 20 items of analysis which are rated according to the subject’s recorded behaviour with a 3-point scale wherein if the item of anaylsis does not apply to the subject, a score of 0 is alotted, if it applies somewhat the score is 1, and if it definately applies then the score is 2. With 20 items of analysis, the maximum score is 40. As a gauge of comprehending how psychopathic a person is on the psychopathy spectrum, a score of 30 is, in the USA, the minimum for categorising someone accurately as a psychopath, and in the United Kingdom the tipping point for diagnosing a psychopath using the same Hare Psychopathy Checklist is 25, perhaps because outlandish/extreme behaviour as characterises a psychopath would be more visible with lesser quantities in a more ordered British society than, say, the Wild West. Whilst psychopaths can live moderately undetected in high-powered, successful jobs, many end up being murderers, such as Ted Bundy, who scored 39/40 on the Hare Psychopathy Checklist. As a means of describing each of the 20 items, I’m using a mixture of the short and pithy descriptions from Business Insider, and the longer descriptions from The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, Hare, R. (1991)

Prasch & The Checklist (items 1-20)

1. Does Prasch have “excess glibness” or superficial charm?

Superficial charm is “the tendency to be smooth, engaging, charming, slick, and verbally facile. Psychopathic charm is not in the least shy, self-conscious, or afraid to say anything. A psychopath never gets tongue-tied.” Supercifical charm is associated with narcissism wherein a person’s ‘charm’ is merely a facade and system for gaining a narcissistic supply from their target. Much of Prasch’s apparent allure to the people who become his disciples in his cult is his (to them) engaging personality and capacity to present himself as a powerful ‘thinker’ with the ability in his speech to overwhelm his audience with his fast-paced rhetoric that leaves them willingly adopting him as their thinker/protector. Prasch, as far back as 1998, was aware of the power of his glibness and charm, recognising it didn’t work in written form and had to be performed in-person to have effect:

“As a speaker I can by the grace of The Lord coupled with sanctified human ability pull things off well. In a written format however, I am afraid that I am a prisoner of my educational experience and training.”

Prasch, email, December 10th, 1998

And respected theologian David Pawson, who arbitrated between Prasch and the Elim denomination (his object of attack and slander in 1998) noted Prasch’s powers:

“…as with other persuasive communicators, some of his devotees regard his pronouncements as the last word on a subject or issue, an attitude he does not appear to discourage.”

David Pawson, Abritration Report, June 29th 1998

Much of Prasch’s power to convince slow-minded simpletons that has created a cult of personality lays in his superficial charm and excess glibness that ultimately has dominated and contorted the minds of his disciples.

Score: 2/2

2. Does Prasch have a grandiose sense of self-worth?

Psychopaths view themselves as much more important than the general population, they have a “grossly inflated view of one’s abilities and self-worth, [are] self-assured, opinionated, cocky, [and] a braggart.” Psychopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior human beings, and such behaviour characterises Jacob Prasch to a T. Prasch has gone on camera before his disciples in Canada as recently as Fall 2019, stating that he is directly and intricately involved in…the Return of Jesus Christ. Prasch outlined in the first 10 minutes of this video how he is a John the Baptist type for the Second Coming of Christ, a view I have critiqued and ridiculed as grandiose, fantastical and ludicrous. Moreover, Prasch has inserted himself into the Bible various times, concluding his powers in debating people equate to King David’s slaying of Goliath. Due to his persistent views of his own almost unparalleled importance to the vanquishing of enemies of God and involvement in the world-ending Return of Christ, it is impossible to conclude that Prasch’s views of himself are anything less than supremely grandiose. When it comes to having an inflated view of his own ability, one must only cast a glance at the video of his 56 known video/audio demands for debating his rivals, and his bulletproof belief that all those 56 are “running scared” from debating him, when reality is they avoid him as he appears “extremist” and “almost demonic”.

Score: 2/2

3. Does Prasch have an excess need for stimulation or proneness to boredom?

This is an “excessive need for novel, thrilling, and exciting stimulation; taking chances and doing things that are risky. Psychopaths often have low self-discipline in carrying tasks through to completion because they get bored easily. They fail to work at the same job for any length of time, for example, or to finish tasks that they consider dull or routine.” Prasch’s need for stimulation is evidenced in his years of being a speed, cocaine, and heroin junkie in New York, during a period of sustained addiction wherein the pleasure receptors in his brain will have been burned out causing an increase in drug consumption to compensate in order to be stimulated, resulting in Prasch admitting his nasal cavity is, as a consequence, disfigured from the drug. The lasting impact of such addiction, as is common in former addicts, is Prasch’s present-day actions appear to correspond with one exhibiting the need for excessive stimulation, be that through his decades-long efforts to insert himself into the lives of at least 56 well known teachers and efforts to begin long-lasting one-sided fueds with them as a means of sourcing a supply of narcissim in his audience and livestreamed screaming sessions, with Prasch exhibiting a near total inability to cease, with periods of inactivity being brief, and his reactions being often ‘knee-jerk’. Prasch’s former colleague David Nathan, whom Prasch turned on suddenly for no real reason, save for it providing him with some apparent form of malicious pleasure, noted in correspondences with Prasch that he knew Prasch’s proneness to boredom and desire to be both stimulated and gratified by knee-jerk-reacting would manifest merely half a page into reading a 2 page email from him. Additionally David Pawson observed:

Not content with teaching the truth, [Prasch] clearly believes that he is also called to expose and denounce all the errors he can find in others. He is adept and even seems eager to discover these and disseminate public warnings about them.

David Pawson, Arbitration Report, June 29th 1998

Score: 2/2

4. Is Prasch a pathological liar?

Pathological lying is a mental disorder manifesting in a person repeatedly and/or compulsively lying. Of all the traits of a psychopath on the list, this is the most obvious one to describe Prasch’s entire life, as, if nothing else, Prasch’s lying has been pathological, from his malicious fabrications published against the Elim denomination in Northern Ireland in the late 1990s claiming they had informed their denomination members to “join an armed gang” and “KILL FOR CHRIST“, to Prasch launching sustained slanderous and malicious lie crusades against all manner of people from that day onwards, resulting in a Government response in Northern Ireland, and Police involvement in Scotland from June 2020. The scale to which Prasch has lied is so vast that lies encompass his entire life, with him going on record to state his father was half-Jewish, contradicting his own biological BROTHER, and contradicting his family’s own genealogical report, culminating in Prasch doubling down in the lie and producing a farcical DNA report he claimed said he was Jewish when it did not. To grasp the scale of Prasch’s lies, consider his brazen reissuing of dozens of his most heavily refuted ones in a December 2020 paper. The term ‘pathalogical liar’ is so associated with the present-day Prasch to describe his life of outright charlatanism that it could ultimately be the term that will sum him up concisely in generations to come.

Score: 2/2

5. Is Prasch conning or manipulative?

“The use of deceit and deception to cheat, con, or defraud others for personal gain; distinguished from Item #4 in the degree to which exploitation and callous ruthlessness is present, as reflected in a lack of concern for the feelings and suffering of one’s victims.” Prasch’s cons and manipulation through the past 20+ years have been heavily documented on this blog, ranging from his efforts to twist $1,500,000 out of the South African government via his 3-prong, 22-year cybersquatting scam, to his presenting a bogus missionary on his charity Moriel’s payroll (Sandy Simpson) whom he claims works present-tense in the Pacific Islands, when the reality is he has lived for years in North Carolina. Moreover, when outed for his financial con artistry, last year Prasch deliberately had himself filmed at an apparently legitimate mission endevour of his in the Philippines as a means of using the children on show as a bulletproof vest for him to wear to absorb criticism for all the many irregularities and fraud found in his charity and in his statements about that charity, such as his video claim that he received no salary from Moriel, when the IRS disagrees with their paperwork listing his salary as running as high as $147,000USD, working out at approximately $70 per hour.

Score: 2/2

6. Does Prasch display a lack of remorse or guilt?

“A lack of feelings or concern for the losses, pain, and suffering of victims; a tendency to be unconcerned, dispassionate, cold-hearted, and non-empathic. This item is usually demonstrated by a disdain for one’s victims.” The effect Prasch has had on his many, often female, victims, has been intense, with one named Sally being viciously maligned and slandered repeatedly, especially last Christmas (as recorded in this video), and another, Deborah, having to call in the Police due to the sustained attacks from Prasch’s cult. Prasch’s targets have been known to reach the point of suicide ideation due to the relentlessness of his attacks, and, knowing that, Prasch has demonstrated an extreme lack of remorse to the point that he has increased his efforts apparently as an effort to finish them off. Extreme lack of empathy characterises Prasch and his cult’s members, with Prasch having never admitted to having done wrong, instead justifying his actions as some twisted form of service to ‘god’.

Score: 2/2

7. Does Prasch have “shallow affect”?

“Emotional poverty or a limited range or depth of feelings; interpersonal coldness in spite of signs of open gregariousness.” Whilst Prasch exhibits a wide range of emotions in his videos throughout the years, the vast majority of his emotions are chategorised on the negative side, such as coldness, anger, hatred, and rarely is there a flicker of what may be called love or compassion, hence he has been described fittingly as a “screamer” and a “railer“. Moreover Prasch’s interpersonal behaviour towards his wife has been noted for decades, with supporters in the 1990s being surprised by his apparent coldness towards her, with observers likening her reaction to him as being the classic behaviour of a “battered wife“. Prasch is only known for exhibiting any form of genuine affection towards small children such as in the Philippines and South Africa where he supports 2 child outreach/care programs. This means his coldness and depth of feeling isn’t complete, but is yet manifested frequently.

Score: 1/2

8. Is Prasch callous, or does he lack empathy?

“A lack of feelings toward people in general; cold, contemptuous, inconsiderate, and tactless.” “Psychopaths just don’t care when bad things happen to other people.” Prasch’s extreme lack of empathy towards those he has unjustly slandered and maligned is unfortunately famous, with a long trail of devastation left in his wake, with Christian ministries almost destroyed in his incessant, demonised attacks, and people spiritually damaged by his grevious callousness and extreme cold-hearted nature which apparently derives pleasure from the pain his words can have on people and ministries. The level of disdain and contempt to which Prasch holds his ‘rivals’ and ‘enemies’ is high and has reached a level in which he actively attempted to publicly coerce one such rival, Bill Randles, into committing suicide by hanging in Summer 2019 for the small matter of Randles having disagreed with him in a blog post. Prasch, being former friends with Randles (whose son Eli Prasch stayed at the Randles’ house with negative results) was aware of the large family Randles had, thus his desire to coerce Randles into suicide, had it succeeded, would have deprived not only a church of its minister, but a large family of its head.

Score: 2/2

9. Does Prasch have a “parasitic lifestyle”?

“An intentional, manipulative, selfish, and exploitative financial dependence on others as reflected in a lack of motivation, low self-discipline, and inability to begin or complete responsibilities.” “Psychopaths prefer not to work for a living. They feel it is easier to take stuff from other people.” Prasch’s parasitic lifestyle has become heavily documented and exposed since the day he attempted to claim Deborah Menelaws operated a parasitic life (which was proven to be a bogus claim) and his own finances and lifestyle became open for examination. As noted earlier, Prasch had claimed to not take a salary from Moriel, yet IRS records proved he takes in as much as $147,000USD per year alongside free world travel (at business class due to his excessive size), and various other perks that all come via his disciples who entirely fund his parasitic lifestyle. Prasch has attempted to claim he isn’t a parasite by claiming a wildly successful secular career which is so successful that his income from it is able to be largely redirected back into Moriel’s coffers. However the evidence he provided on this was researched and exposed to be an unsuccessful 20+ year effort to get $1,500,000 out of the South African government via his cybersquatting scam. This failure to substantiate his claims about his own secular income means it is probable his entire life is entirely funded by his parasitic leeching and sponging from his disciples, an effort that has sponged himself approximately half a million dollars in the past decade, and that’s just the US accounts, considering Prasch claimed Moriel made £91,000 from 16 months in the UK alone back in 1997-98 ($151,000USD in 1998’s money and exchange rates).

Score: 2/2

10. Does Prasch have poor behavioral controls?

“Expressions of irritability, annoyance, impatience, threats, aggression, and verbal abuse; inadequate control of anger and temper; acting hastily.” “Psychopaths find it difficult to keep themselves in check.” Prasch’s entire ministry can be summed up as “a series of expressions of irratibility, annoyance, impatience, threats, aggression, and verbal abuse”, for this behaviour represents a large proportion of his output for which he is salaried highly for. Prasch’s fits of rage, and apparent inability to stop himself from acting in the moment at live conferences (see his 9-minute lie-filled screaming rant at a 2019 Conference here), and his inability to stymie the desire to act in such a way by recording premeditated slander-fests and release them after minimal editing despite sharp rebuke and ridicule, demonstrates Prasch fits the bill perfectly, moreover his reported reliance on hard liquor, and states of intoxication live on stage, reveal Prasch has very little, if any, behavioural control.

Score: 2/2

11. Does Prasch have a history of promiscuous sexual behavior?

“A variety of brief, superficial relations, numerous affairs, and an indiscriminate selection of sexual partners; the maintenance of several relationships at the same time; a history of attempts to sexually coerce others into sexual activity or taking great pride at discussing sexual exploits or conquests.” Prasch has multiple times boasted about his sexual conquests in his ‘testimony’, usually rather grotesquely in a church setting, even outlining how he slept with one of the wives of The Rolling Stones, snorting his narcissism inhaler heavily whilst doing so, meaning whilst his behaviour has ostensibly altered since he began selling the drug of Kabbalah Gnosticism to Christians rather than Heroin to Junkies in the 1970s, his self-described former behaviour and his boasting about it means he manages to score on this item too.

Score: 1/2

12. Does Prasch have a history of early behavioral problems?

“A variety of behaviors prior to age 13, including lying, theft, cheating, vandalism, bullying, sexual activity, fire-setting, glue-sniffing, alcohol use, and running away from home.” “As children, psychopaths often have a history of cruelty to others.” Prasch hasn’t spoken much about his pre-teen years, so all that is known is after them he turned into a hardcore drug user at age 16, then a heroin dealer, and a sexually promiscuous Communist, so it is likely for such rot to set in so early and to reach such a point so quickly, that behavioural problems presented prior to age 13, but without adequate data Prasch manages to escape a charge for the first time.

Score: 0/2

13. Does Prasch lack realistic long-term goals?

“An inability or persistent failure to develop and execute long-term plans and goals; a nomadic existence, aimless, lacking direction in life.” “Psychopaths prefer crazy schemes over life or career goals.” Whilst it could be argued Prasch’s creation and maintenance of his cult ‘Moriel’ is the execution of long-term plans and goals, until you become aware of its history and find that Prasch has ultimately had little to do with the execution of it all and has relied almost entirely upon cult members to maintain every aspect of it, screaming at them whenever he wants something done, as his former Moriel Australia volunteer Henry Sheppard heavily documented in the late 1990s. And that cult group’s charity ‘Moriel Ministries’ has as much acted as a front operation for Prasch’s various crazy schemes such as being part of his $1,500,000 cybersquatting operation as documented here. But regarding direction in life, Prasch has made it his goal to be a Witchfinder General, and created through his various schemes a system of receiving monetary reward by channelling that aim.

Score: 1/2

14. Is Prasch overly impulsive?

“The occurrence of behaviors that are unpremeditated and lack reflection or planning; inability to resist temptation, frustrations, and urges; a lack of deliberation without considering the consequences; foolhardy, rash, unpredictable, erratic, and reckless.” Prasch’s foolhardy and rash onslaught into various attacks sparked by his fleshly urges borne of frustrations were the cause of his facing a lawsuit from the Elim denomination in the 1990s when he launched headlong into an unwinable battle against them and used various powers of darkness (slander, lies, defamation, calumny) to try to annihilate them. David Pawson who acted as arbiter between them noted:

“On his own admission, emotion takes over, especially if the initial criticism is rejected or just ignored. A combination of frustration and indignation lead to intemperate language, unchecked accusations and insulting innuendo. The result is a barrage of abuse…”

David Pawson, Arbitration Report, June 29th 1998,

This describes a man ruled by his impulses, lacking the capacity to comprehend the consequences for himself (in the above instance it resulted in a lawsuit, and his slanderous tirades against the Menelaws in recent years have resulted in Police involvement), albeit he clearly anticipates the negative consequences of his actions for his victims.

Score: 2/2

15. Does Prasch have a high level of irresponsibility?

“Repeated failure to fulfill or honor obligations and commitments; such as not paying bills, defaulting on loans, performing sloppy work, being absent or late to work, failing to honor contractual agreements.” “Psychopaths aren’t big on doing the right thing.” Whilst Prasch does maintain his commitments in appearances, save for health-related cancellations, with him being recorded as attending scheduled tours even in blizzards, his work standard, especially evidenced in what should be the pinnacle of his achievements—his books—is only the ‘height’ of sloppiness with him producing multiple books all of which lack citations (that is evidences of where he sourced his information and quotes). The many-tentacled Moriel is largely maintained, however, by cult member volunteers, meaning legal paperwork is completed by people more capable than Prasch most of the time, with them liable for the blame if someone or Prasch drops the ball, such as in New Zealand where legal paperwork wasn’t submitted for several years resulting in Moriel’s charitable status there being revoked. Whilst much of Moriel’s activities can therefore be sourced back to volunteers rather than Prasch in regard to obligations, bills, contractural agreements, there are 2 clear things from that realm that can be sourced directly back to Prasch. The first item is Prasch’s legally binding agreement made with Studio Scotland regarding rights to use his image and content they filmed in their 2 films The Daniel Project and The Daniel Connection. Prasch publicly reneged on his signed contract when he fell out with the filmmakers over a decade after filming, causing them to withdraw his material from future releases of their films, despite not legally having to do so, but rather since Prasch has recently been exposed as a false teacher who teaches a false Christology of the Metatron as Jesus. The second item is an email dating back to Prasch registering Moriel as a charity in 1998, an email in which Prasch outlines how he intends to do his best to “protect ourselves from buracratic [sic] scrutiny from Brussells [sic]”:

Moreover, as mentioned in item 20 below, Prasch has openly boasted of “fiddling” the accounts in his favour as a means of benefitting his family, then blaming Jesus for doing the fiddling.

Score: 1/2

16. Does Prasch fail to accept responsibility for his own actions?

“A failure to accept responsibility for one’s actions reflected in low conscientiousness, an absence of dutifulness, antagonistic manipulation, denial of responsibility, and an effort to manipulate others through this denial.” “When you’re a psychopath, it’s always someone else’s fault.” Blaming others and being unable to accept any form of culpability in heavily documented and exposed sinful behaviour and spiritual abuse has been a hallmark of Prasch’s behaviour since former volunteer Henry Sheppard began documenting Prasch’s extreme behaviour in 1999. Henry’s records reveal how Prasch worked to escape any and all responsibility for his actions and merely blamed all and sundry for the consequences of his own actions via inventing reasons to shift the blame, thus slandering the others. This behaviour has remained consistent until present-day with Prasch repeatedly issuing videos and articles damning everybody for the consequences of his own actions. A key example is his one-sided falling out with former Moriel staff member David Nathan, where Prasch has been found to be hypocritical in his reasoning for rejecting David (a doctrinal issue Prasch was evidenced to have supported previously), and received much flack for his outlandish behaviour because of it. When proven a hypocrite and wrong, and insane, Prasch persisted in inventing evidence against David and repeating the invented evidence over the course of 2 years despite it being proven to be nonsense at the beginning of those 2 years. Prasch has repeatedly doubled down in his avoidance of responsibility and has repeatedly tried to blame everybody else when facts and reality are weighed heavily against him. Moreover when Prasch attacked Bible teacher Jan Markell in early Summer 2020, he openly stated on video that the reason he had previously attacked her was because she had caused him to attack her, meaning he shifted the blame (utilising gaslighting) and refused therefore to accept responsibility for his actions. Tim Wirth, a former staff member of Prasch’s, has stated Prasch had years prior been told never to admit to blame for anything as that admittance would open him up to litigation.

Score: 2/2

17. Has Prasch had many short-term “marital” relationships?

“A lack of commitment to a long-term relationship reflected in inconsistent, undependable, and unreliable commitments in life, including marital.” “Psychopaths have an inability to commit to, or repeatedly betray, long-term relationships.” While Prasch admits to “shacking up with broads” and being thrown out of “whorehouses”, he hasn’t fit the specific criteria of embarking on “marital” level relationships for short periods, claiming fidelity to his wife Pavia.

Score: 0/2

18. Does Prasch have a history of juvenile delinquency?

“Behavior problems between the ages of 13-18; mostly behaviors that are crimes or clearly involve aspects of antagonism, exploitation, aggression, manipulation, or a callous, ruthless tough-mindedness.” Prasch, by his own admittance, was a heavy drug user and drug dealer as a juvenile:

“When I was 16 I was fooling around with heroin, by the time I got the college I was strung out on cocaine.”

Prasch, The Grain Offering, Moriel TV

“When I was a kid I’d wake up in the morning, roll a spliff and begin snorting cocaine or shooting it.  To get through university I had to take enough speed to win the 5th at Newmarket.  To finance my drug habit I had to sell cocaine.  I lived immorally, sexually, just shacking up with broads; I didn’t care.”

Prasch, ‘Consecration of the Firstborn’, Tree of Life Messianic Fellowship

Dealing drugs is an exploitation of the addled, especially when he was aware his descent into dealing to them was caused by his own addiction to what he peddled, and since cocaine and heroin frequently lead to overdose and death, his dealing was a sustained and habitual callous behaviour with a cavalier disregard for human life in the drive to maintain his own high on the drug via the hot money he earned as a pusher.

“Yes I was a Communist and a Marxist in my teenage years, at University I would firebomb Police cars at demonstrations against the Vietnam War.”

Prasch, The Trials of Jesus

Score: 2/2

19. Has Prasch ever experienced a “revocation of conditional release”?

“A revocation of probation or other conditional releases due to technical violations, such as carelessness, low deliberation, or failing to appear.” “Even when psychopaths catch a break — like being let out of prison on probation — they tend to screw up.” Although Prasch has repeatedly been exposed for deeds verging on criminality (severe spiritual abuse, fake identity creation, financial fraud, and slander), he hasn’t to my knowledge been arrested so fails to qualify for this item presently, albeit this is subject to change.

Score: 0/2

20. Does Prasch display “criminal versatility”?

“A diversity of types of criminal offenses, regardless if the person has been arrested or convicted for them; taking great pride at getting away with crimes.” “Psychopaths differ from normal criminals because they don’t really care which type of laws they break — they’ll break any of them, under the right circumstances.” As alluded to in the previous item, Prasch has demonstrated a wide ability in criminal versatility throughout his life, from committing various sustained efforts at million dollar fraud, charity fraud, the likelihood of insurance fraud, having his cult members engage in Police impersonation, and engaging himself in decades of impersonating a Jew when he’s 0% Jewish then making a killing financially out of that impersonation. The latter crime of being an impostor required a level of sophistication in prepping and submitting multiple fraudulent documents as a means of gaining a Jewish identity from Israel (should Prasch’s account of being issued with one be true). Add to that Prasch’s previous record of drug dealing in New York, and his later switch to peddling the drug of Kabbalah Gnosticism to dimwits as a means to create a moderate empire built of facades to hide behind and to engage in the various types of criminality, in an, until 2018, undetected manner. As the money had rolled in for 20+ years at that point, it is likely Prasch experienced pride in the getting away with it all, and explains his recent rages and fake Police coverups to try to shut down the many exposés of his severe spiritual abuse, in which he has engaged in more criminality of rampant slander, threats and bullying. Additionally in it all Prasch has stated openly that he has “fiddled” his accounts in his favour, and has shifted the blame from himself to none other than….Jesus (see minute 17 of this video). This all means Prasch has, throughout his career, turned his hand to various diverse forms of criminality.

Score: 2/2

Result:

Total Score: 30/40

Through this rather lengthy and careful examination of known behaviour of Jacob Prasch, bearing in mind there are 2 items (12 & 17) wherein there is little evidence, which therefore scored Prasch 0/4, Prasch’s overall total of 30/40 may well be under-scored and could be as high as 34 with additional data to fill in the gaps, although is likely to be closer to 31 than 34. Regardless of the missing data, what is certain is that the results are not over-scored, meaning at 30/40 Prasch would in the USA reach the threshold of being diagnosed as a psychopath, and in the UK where the threshold is lower, Prasch would have surpassed it by a full 5 points.

Prasch’s behaviour over decades has consistently provided evidence of psychopathy, but with the score of 30 he only marginally qualifies for that label, yet by reaching that psychopath threshold it can explain how Prasch has looked so insane for so many years but never reached the point of a severe and full-scale dementedness, a dementedness which I suggest he may reach if he were to persist in his sustained recent madness of forging DNA reports etc., behaviour which could potentially propel him to Cult Zenith which various other cult leaders have reached where their insanity or bloodthirsty madness reached its dangerous cult-ending peak. However, earlier this month in December 2020, Prasch appeared to step back a little by changing the narrative about his widely exposed fake ‘Jewish identity’ by saying he first adopted Jewish ways when moving to Israel in the 1970s, which was a huge difference from his Summer/Fall 2020 fake DNA report and video statements trying to prove he was BORN half Jewish as his books and various talks alluded to. This means Prasch is perhaps ratcheting down rather than ratcheting up his lunatic behaviour, yet in doing that his psychopathy will remain so I don’t expect his behaviour to ratchet down particularly much as he doesn’t, by nature, have the capacity as a psychopath to modify his behaviour long-term, meaning he’s stuck in the parameters of behaviour set by his psychopathy, except that he actually become a Christian and has the peaks and valleys of behaviour trimmed off, as hammer attacker and fellow psychopath David Wood (Acts17Apologetics) experienced when becoming a Christian. Since Prasch is unlikely to admit guilt and therefore be unable/unwilling to repent, God only knows what Prasch’s peaks of behaviour will be in the future, but if he reaches Cult Zenith I’ll begin posting again.


PraschSeason1PraschSeason2PraschSeason3PraschSeason4PraschAbuseInvestigationThePraschFilesPraschResearchBlog

12 thoughts on “Is Jacob Prasch a Psychopath? (Hare Checklist Study)

  1. I think Chavez is right there with Prasch hovering around 30 points of psychopathy. The only difference is Chavez is half Prasch’s age and less known so his behavior goes unnoticed. Give it about 10years and Chavez will probably be surpassing Prasch’s psychopathic narcissistic behavior.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Lets pray that Josh does not go there and makes things right with his bride Joelle and restores their marriage.
      I am hopeful

      Like

  2. Pretty good assessment
    Lets talk about this one
    “11. Does Prasch have a history of promiscuous sexual behaviour?

    “A variety of brief, superficial relations, numerous affairs, and an indiscriminate selection of sexual partners; the maintenance of several relationships at the same time; a history of attempts to sexually coerce others into sexual activity or taking great pride at discussing sexual exploits or conquests.” Prasch has multiple times boasted about his sexual conquests in his ‘testimony’, usually rather grotesquely in a church setting, even outlining how he slept with one of the wives of The Rolling Stones, snorting his narcissism inhaler heavily whilst doing so, meaning whilst his behaviour has ostensibly altered since he began selling the drug of Kabbalah Gnosticism to Christians rather than Heroin to Junkies in the 1970s, his self-described former behaviour and his boasting about it means he manages to score on this item too.” end quote

    Prasch is known for his flirting with women
    Which he proclaims is innocent and others proclaim “O that’s just Jacob he’s from New York”.

    But scripture raised the bar for all of us.
    Matt 5:28 “New American Standard Bible
    but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” end verse

    Now only God can read minds and heart but when you offer to read “Lady Chatterley’s Lover” (I dah to google the book) when someone asks you if you have any books that are narrated by you that’s really crossing the line. And speaking of lines, if you feel comfortable saying that with a line of people in a Meet and Greet and church elders standing by something is really wrong.
    There have also been other complaints as well

    Like

      1. And you, who is not a Christian, suffering from MPD and criticizing my brother.
        You, whose gravatar shows you preoccupation with an R-rated movie of sex and drugs.
        A biographical movie of a b-rated Hollywood actress wannabee. She is never good enough. Never thin enough or pretty.
        She fails and gets into the occult and sex and drugs.
        She suffers torturous mental illness from her homelife and upbringing as a child.
        And when she realizes what she is…she decides to overdose and kill herself.
        All of these things you have falsely accused my brother of you have done. And in reality…you proudly wear them as your badge of courage…your gravatar.
        You are playing this drama to the end. It is your own doing. You can blame no one else.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. It’s merely an image of someone looking above that illustrates my replying to comments which are above.
        And if you want to diagnose Multiple Personality Disorder I suggest you look at all your comments on this blog, which go like this:




        Like

      3. “Just someone looking above!” LOL an R-rated flick. And you accuse Jacob. Lol What a double standard…
        People will see what you really are. Factory girl. Keep up your pathetic drama.

        Like

      4. Your open fabricating of information, and your presenting of it as a ‘guilt by association’ system of damnation are pretty wild to observe, but thanks for recording it here for an audience to witness the fruit of being a Prasch cult member manifest.

        Liked by 2 people

  3. Now on to this point19.
    “Has Prasch ever experienced a “revocation of conditional release”?

    “A revocation of probation or other conditional releases due to technical violations, such as carelessness, low deliberation, or failing to appear.” “Even when psychopaths catch a break — like being let out of prison on probation — they tend to screw up.” Although Prasch has repeatedly been exposed for deeds verging on criminality (severe spiritual abuse, fake identity creation, financial fraud, and slander), he hasn’t to my knowledge been arrested so fails to qualify for this item presently, albeit this is subject to change.”

    Maybe God put Prasch on house arrest in the UK?
    And is giving Prasch time to repent.
    Feel sorry for Pavia though

    Like

  4. Now this last one.
    12. Does Prasch have a history of early behavioural problems?

    “A variety of behaviours prior to age 13, including lying, theft, cheating, vandalism, bullying, sexual activity, fire-setting, glue-sniffing, alcohol use, and running away from home.” “As children, psychopaths often have a history of cruelty to others.” Prasch hasn’t spoken much about his pre-teen years, so all that is known is after them he turned into a hardcore drug user at age 16, then a heroin dealer, and a sexually promiscuous Communist, so it is likely for such rot to set in so early and to reach such a point so quickly, that behavioural problem presented prior to age 13, but without adequate data, Prasch manages to escape a charge for the first time.”

    Now I know some things about Praschs father and James has stated to me his dad was cruel which was why he revolted and then sent to the Jewish Community Center.
    Not because he was Jewish but because he was hard to handle at home.
    Very sad that his dad was so mean to him
    I know James loved his mother dearly

    Like

Comments are closed.